Do you have a current tenant-wide inventory of apps, flows and agents?
Owners, usage and critical resources should be visible centrally rather than reconstructed from manual spreadsheets.
Get more than a maturity score. The assessment highlights your three weakest governance areas and gives a concrete next step for each one.
Owners, usage and critical resources should be visible centrally rather than reconstructed from manual spreadsheets.
The role, creation and retirement of default, development, test and production environments should be explicit.
Managed Environments and environment-group rules can enforce relevant settings consistently across larger estates.
Connector and data-flow boundaries should operate as defined tenant- or environment-level guardrails.
Repeatable releases, environment variables and connection references should replace manual import/export and post-deployment rewiring.
Support responsibility and ownership transfer should be defined before a maker changes role or leaves.
For supported production solutions, document which identity runs what, who can recover it and how ownership is transferred.
Critical systems need a central health/usage view and defined alert or incident path rather than manual run-history checks.
Experimental apps, team solutions and business-critical systems should not all run under the same control model.
Orphaned, inactive, policy-violating or risky resources need an owner, deadline and closure rule.
In 2026, native Admin Center capabilities should be the baseline; custom components should remain only where they serve a real operating need.
Define sharing, access, connector boundaries, AI settings and which capabilities are allowed in which environments.