← InsightsDecision guide

One-off automation project or ongoing development capacity?

The two models solve different problems. A bounded process fits a project; a changing backlog benefits from flexible recurring capacity.

01

Project: when there is a clear finish line

If the scope can be defined, a project gives a clean delivery and budget framework.

  • clear scope
  • defined milestones
  • handover
  • project budget
02

Ongoing capacity: when the backlog keeps moving

Many organisations have ten smaller problems rather than one large project. A recurring capacity can follow the priorities without a new procurement cycle each time.

  • ongoing backlog
  • smaller improvements
  • support and stabilisation
  • changing priorities
03

Avoid turning continuous operations into endless mini-projects

If a system changes all the time, quoting every small change separately creates overhead. Stable systems, however, do not need permanent capacity.

  • change frequency
  • business criticality
  • internal capability
  • support demand
04

The key question: is there useful work every month?

A recurring model works when there is consistently valuable work to prioritise. If not, a project remains the cleaner choice.

  • monthly demand
  • response time
  • backlog quality
  • internal owner
Related service

Ongoing development

Ongoing Power Platform, Microsoft 365, Azure and AI development in a predictable monthly model.

View the service →
First step

Show us the process you would like to make simpler.

In a 30-minute call we look at how it works today, what is worth automating, where AI can help, and what should stay simple.